দি  ইন্সটিটিউট ফর কুরআনিক রিসার্চ এন্ড এ্যাপ্লিকেশন (ইক্বরা)

লক্ষ্য

ইক্বরার লক্ষ্য হলো বর্তমান ও ভবিষ্যত প্রজন্মের জন্য স্রষ্টার ঐশী বাণীর সমন্বিত অধ্যয়ন ও সার্বজনীন প্রয়োগের জন্য জ্ঞানদীপ্ত অনুশীলন।

উদ্দেশ্য

ইক্বরার উদ্দেশ্য হলো কুরআনের বাণীর উত্তরোত্তর সমৃদ্ধ অনুধাবনের জন্য টেকসই ভিত্তি প্রস্তুত করা এবং জীবন ও সমাজের প্রায়োগিকতার জন্য প্রয়োজনীয় জ্ঞানভিত্তিক ফ্রেমওয়ার্ক বা কাঠামো নির্মাণ।

প্রকাশিত বইসমূহ

What We Know about the Chronology of the Quran (so far)

Quoted from the Site: Understanding Islam Today, written by Mark Anderson


According to Muslim tradition, the recitations comprising the Qur’an were compiled in book form only after Muhammad’s death. Western scholars[1] wish the compilers had ordered the recitations chronologically, but they did not.[2] We also wish the Qur’an were rich in details identifying the situations its recitations addressed, so we might more accurately determine the chronological order of its suras, or chapters, to better understand them. But they very rarely do more than allude to those situations.

Muslim traditionists assigned some passages to events in Muhammad’s prophetic career—the “occasions of the revelation” (asbab al-nazul). But they disagreed over the occasions of certain passages, and many of the events cited are minor and have no certain date. Muslim scholars also listed the suras in chronological order, divided into two periods, Meccan (610-22 CE) and Medinan (622-32). But four points are noteworthy in this respect.

First, the scholars’ primary motivation in doing this appears to have been legal, to determine which command on a given topic was given last, since they gave the final command the power to abrogate earlier ones. Thus, legal concerns played a major role in determining the suras’ order. Second, the scholars disagreed over the placement of 23 out of the Qur’an’s 114 suras, as well as on which verses in the Meccan and the Medinan suras were out-of-period insertions. Third, there are also discrepancies between duplicate lists from the same scholar, as recorded by other scholars.

Last, while most Muslims today accept a slightly modified version of the order given by Ibn cAbbas (d. 688), that has more to do with the power of the printing press, than the power of any arguments for his order’s reliability. For the editors of the world’s most widely sold Qur’an, the Egyptian standard edition of 1924, put Ibn cAbbas’s chronological placement (slightly modified) in each sura’s heading.

Hence, though most Western scholars began with the traditional Muslim chronology, they questioned its accuracy and modified it in various ways.

For example, Western scholars established chronology based on a sura’s style and contents. But while Muslim scholars allowed legal considerations to trump a sura’s style and contents wherever legal issues were involved, Western scholars did not. Like the early Muslim scholars and Gustav Weil (d. 1889), Theodore Nöldeke (d. 1930) took the law-oriented suras to be Medinan. Nöldeke took the short suras characterized by exalted poetry to be early, and the longer, more prosaic ones to be late. Nöldeke also counted the suras that included oaths and those referring to al-Rahman, the Merciful, as Meccan. Nöldeke’s chronology further divided the Meccan suras into three periods, showing a progression in the recitations from sublime enthusiasm to calm. Nöldeke’s chronology was eventually revised by Friedrich Schwally (d. 1919). Although the Nöldeke-Schwally chronology allows for some out-of-period passages, it generally takes the sura to be a unit.

By contrast, some Western chronologies—Richard Bell’s, for example, view the Qur’an’s longer suras as composites of unrelated shorter passages, given at different times.[3] As a result, Bell’s chronology jumps from one passage to another, across the various suras. Recent studies, however, have argued on the basis of stylistic features for each sura’s unity,[4] suggesting that it is from one period of time, whether or not it was originally delivered in one sitting.

While most Western scholars rely on the Nöldeke-Schwally chronology, others argue that there are too many gaps in our knowledge for us to have a precise chronology. Both are right.

No chronology is more than an educated guess, especially with respect to the order of either the Meccan or the Medinan suras. Two things, however, tell us not to dismiss questions concerning chronology:

  • We all come to the Qur’an with some chronological sequence in mind, however tentative—or unacknowledged. Indeed, without a rudimentary chronology, the Qur’an becomes a hopeless muddle.
  • Given the gaps in our knowledge, we all work with an approximate Qur’an sequence. Nevertheless, not all approximations are equal: a well thought out approximation is far better than a poorly thought out one.

The Nöldeke-Schwally chronology can doubtless be improved upon. Nevertheless, it has established itself among Western scholars as “a rule of thumb for the approximate order of the sūras in their chronological sequence.”[5] And interpreting the Qur’an in accord with this chronology is far more productive than simply decrying the many lamentable gaps in our knowledge. Because, again, we all inevitably bring some chronological sequence to the Qur’an.

A Traditional Muslim Chronology

Regarding Muslim chronologies, even versions of the chronology going back to Ibn cAbbas differ slightly. In any case, it’s worthwhile comparing the Western chronology above with an Ibn cAbbas chronology, this being cAbd al-Kafi’s version of the one given by cAta’.

Meccan:

96, 68, 73, 74, 111, 81, 87, 92, 89, 93, 94, 103, 100, 108, 102, 107, 109, 105, 113, 114, 112, 53, 80, 97, 91, 85, 95, 106, 101, 75, 104, 77, 50, 90, 86, 54, 38, 7, 72, 36, 25, 35, 19, 20, 56, 26, 27, 28, 17, 10, 11, 12, 15, 6, 37, 31, 34, 39, 40, 4, 1, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 51, 88, 18, 16, 71, 14, 21, 23, 32, 52, 67, 69, 70, 78, 79, 82, 84, 30, 29, 83

Medinan:

2, 8, 3, 33, 60, 4, 99, 57, 47, 13, 55, 76, 65, 98, 59, 110, 24, 22, 63, 58, 49, 66, 62, 64, 61, 48, 5, 9.

The Nöldeke-Schwally “Chronology of the Revelations” 

Early Meccan:           

96, 74, 111, 106, 108, 104, 107, 102, 105, 92, 90, 94, 93, 97, 86, 91, 80, 68, 87, 95, 103, 85, 73, 101, 99, 82, 81, 53, 84, 100, 79, 77, 78, 88, 89, 75, 83, 69, 51, 52, 56, 70, 55, 112, 109, 113, 114, 1

Middle Meccan:        

54, 37, 71, 76, 44, 50, 20, 26, 15, 19, 38, 36, 43, 72, 67, 23, 21, 25, 17, 27, 18

Late Meccan:             

32, 41, 45, 16, 30, 11, 14, 12, 40, 28, 39, 29, 31, 42, 10, 34, 35, 7, 46, 6, 13

Medinan:

2, 98, 64, 62, 8, 47, 3, 61, 57, 4, 65, 59, 33, 63, 24, 58, 22, 48, 66, 60, 110, 49, 9, 5 [6]

In 2018 Mark Durie put forward a new chronology, based on neither the Muslim nor the Nöldeke-Schwally chronology. Durie’s intention was to base it on the gradual development of the Qur’an’s literary style, without reference to Muhammad’s traditional biography.

Mark Durie’s “Non-biographical Chronology”

Durie begins by dividing the suras into two groups, the dividing point being a theological transition he believes occurred between Sura 22 and Sura 110. He considers each sura a unit belonging either before or after this divide, with the exception of Suras 73, 74 and 85, which he views as compilations. He assigns a value to each of the Qur’an’s lexemes and to each of its three-lexeme formulae, depending on how characteristic each is of either the pre- or the post-transition group. He then combines the average of each sura’s lexical values with the average of its formulaic values to produce a metric for each sura. This allows him to plot its place on the Qur’an’s developmental order,[7] as follows: 

Pre-transition Suras:

101, 77, 54, 81, 88, 86, 78, 79, 75, 91, 95, 50, 56, 69, 87, 82, 68, 102, 55, 89, 26, 74a (vv. 1-30, 32-58), 73a (vv. 1-19), 52, 15, 111, 37, 85a (vv. 12-22), 51, 70, 80, 114, 105, 53, 38, 23, 27, 96, 21, 104, 71, 44, 46, 25, 17, 76, 36, 100, 20, 34, 11, 43, 32, 41, 103, 30, 28, 67, 83, 92, 39, 84, 1, 10, 109, 7, 6, 93, 72, 19, 40, 12, 106, 18, 35, 45, 107, 29, 16, 90, 113, 13, 97, 99, 31, 14, 42, 94, 108, 112, 22

Post-transition Suras:

110, 74b (v. 31), 2, 47, 85b (vv. 1-11), 66, 3, 60, 5, 63, 57, 64, 4, 24, 62, 65, 8, 59, 98, 9, 58, 61, 33, 48, 49, 73b (v. 20)

Durie’s order is in various respects different from that of either the traditional Muslim chronology or the Nöldeke-Schwally chronology. However, it is clearly more like its predecessors than unlike them.

In fact, though based on a very different method, his chronology can be said to affirm the traditional chronology in broad outline.

But Durie does not remark on this remarkable convergence or how the events underlying the Qur’an’s emergence relate to the traditional account of Muhammad’s career in Mecca and Medina.[8]

———————-

[1] I use “Western” here to refer to their cultural heritage, as opposed to their geographic location.

[2] They most likely ordered it as they did for the maximum effect of its liturgical recitation. Neal Robinson, Discovering the Qur’an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text (London: SCM Press, 1996), 11-13.

[3] Richard Bell, Qur’an. English: The Qur’ān, translated, with a critical re-arrangement of the Surahs (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1937-39).

[4] For example, Michel Cuypers, The Banquet: A Reading of the Fifth Sura of the Qur’an (Miami: Convivium Press, 2009); and Raymond Farrin, Structure and Qur’anic Interpretation: A Study of Symmetry and Coherence in Islam’s Holy Text (Ashland, OR: White Cloud Press, 2014).

[5] Gerhard Bowering, “Chronology and the Qur’ān,” s.v. Encyclopaedia of the Qur’ān, Jane Dammen McAuliffe et al ed. (Leiden: Brill Publishers, 2001-06). For more on the chronology of the Qur’an, see Bowering’s article, plus Neal Robinson, Discovering the Qurʼan: A contemporary approach to a veiled text (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003), 60-96; and W. Mongomery Watt, Bell’s Introduction to the Qur’ān (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1970), 108-20.

[6] According to the Nöldeke-Schwally chronology, the following suras have out-of-period verses: 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, 22, 29, 31, 51, 53, 55, 56, 73, 74, 75, 84, 103. For the specific verses involved, see Robinson, Discovering the Qur’an, 78.

[7] Mark Durie, “A Stylistic, Non-biographical Chronological Ordering of the Surahs of the Qur’an,” Arthur Jeffery Centre for the Study of Islam, Melbourne School of Theology, December 2018. Besides the sequential order of the suras, Durie’s precise methodology allows him to compute the relative stylistic distance between each of the suras. For more on this, see Durie’s The Qur’an and Its Biblical Reflexes: Investigations into the Genesis of a Religion (Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2018) 75-104.

[8] David Marshall, “The Qur’an and Its Biblical Reflexes: Investigations in the Genesis of a Religion in Review of Qur’anic Research, vol. 6, no. 4 (2020) 5.

Credit: The Chronology of the Qur’an

ট্যাগ / কী-ওয়ার্ড:

অন্যান্য প্রবন্ধ

April 18, 2024
Quran Mistranslated Series - Ep 1: 36:40 "Each in an orbit, floating" - Major Mistranslation That Leads To A Geocentric Model of The Universe

In this series we will tackle Quranic verses which are repeatedly wrong translated across time in many different translation. The first in this series will focus on 36:40

April 16, 2024
The IQRA joins IQSA (International Quranic Studies Association)

We are happy to announce that The IQRA has joined the International Quranic Studies Association (IQSA). The International Qur’anic Studies Association (IQSA) is the first learned society dedicated to the study of the Qur’an. We hold conferences around the world and publish cutting-edge research and scholarship. The IQSA community and its partners include scholars, students, […]

April 15, 2024
আল কুরআনে তাগুতের পরিচয়

২:২৫৬ :: দীন গ্রহণের ব্যাপারে কোনো জবরদস্তি নেই। নিশ্চয় সত্যপথ স্পষ্ট হয়ে গেছে বিভ্রান্তি থেকে। সুতরাং যে ব্যক্তি তাগুতের প্রতি কুফর করবে এবং আল্লাহর প্রতি ঈমান আনবে সে এমন এক মজবুত হাতল আঁকড়ে ধরবে যা ভেঙ্গে যাবার নয়। আর আল্লাহ সর্বশ্রোতা, সর্বজ্ঞ। ২:২৫৭ :: আল্লাহ মু’মিনদের অভিভাবক, তিনি তাদেরকে অন্ধকার থেকে আলোর দিকে বের করে […]

April 9, 2024
The Origin of Arabic Language & Its History

"And thus We have revealed to you an Arabic Qur'an" - Surah Ash-shuraa, verse 7 We explore the history and development of the Arabic language, as well as its connection to religion. Here are compilation of a few resources via YouTube. The Origins of Arabic - The Arabic Language How Arabia Got Its Name? What […]

April 8, 2024
Ghulam Ahmad Parwez - A Scholar of Islam

Among Muslim scholars, particularly who translated and interpreted the Quran in modern times, I am very fascinated and interested in the thoughts of late Ghulam Ahmad Parwez (1903-1985), also known as G A Parwez. Here is a summary as a way of introduction to this noteworthy scholar. Ghulam Ahmad Parwez was a prominent Islamic scholar, […]

April 6, 2024
The Qur'an and the Just Society - Ramon Harvey - Book Review

Main Topic or Theme The main theme of "The Qur'an and the Just Society" by Ramon Harvey revolves around exploring the ethical and moral framework provided by the Qur'an for creating a just society. Key Ideas or Arguments Chapter Titles or Main Sections Chapter Summaries Key Takeaways or Conclusions Author's Background and Qualifications Ramon Harvey […]

April 5, 2024
না বুঝে কুরআন পড়ে আমরা শয়তানকে যেভাবে সাহায্য করি

১.স্টারপিক ফ্যাক্টরির মালিক সোহান সাহেব। ফ্যাক্টরির বয়স প্রায় ২৫ বছরের বেশি, মালিকের বয়স ৬৭ বছর। তার ফ্যাক্টরির পুরনো এবং বিশ্বস্ত ম্যানেজার হলো ফারুক সাহেব। মালিক সোহান সাহেব এবার ঠিক করেছেন টানা ২ মাসের জন্য তিনি ফ্যাক্টরির নিয়মিত কাজ থেকে বিরতি নিয়ে আমেরিকায় তার মেয়ে, মেয়ে জামাই ও নাতিদের সাথে সময় কাটাবেন। দীর্ঘ ২ মাস তার […]

March 29, 2024
ইসলামের আদিপর্ব অনুসারে কাবার পরিচয়

Sean Anthony is a Professor of Near Eastern and South Asian Languages and Cultures, The Ohio State University gives a presentation in YouTube on a talk titled: "What is the Kaaba? Perspectives from the Early Islamic Period."